there are no good tools for working with lots of spatially organised information.This type of map required thousands of man-hours to research and design: it takes a lot of time to make such map, e.g.There is a number of presentation examples of such technology trees in computer strategy games, such as Civilization and Alpha Centauri. There are better ways to organise this information visually, but they require a lot of work. It's in Russian, but you get the idea: there are fields (branches) and specific applications (leaves) that are colored according to their ETA. This is an example of a nanotechnology tree. This technique is called a "scenario matrix" - it can be a useful tool. We can consider the present state of the art as the set of currently achieved technologiy nodes. We can take account of ideological positions as value judgements on different sets of nodes. Producing this list it is very similar to what tech. It must be automagically generated from a database. uncertainty factor for the date of arrivalĬlearly, the production of a technology tree cannot be done manually.The content is a list of developments with the following attributes: The tree itself is about PRESENTATION, not CONTENT. what transhumanist technologies we need to explore, see the Transhumanism domain model. To get an overview of the domain model, i.e.
![european war 3 easy tech game wiki european war 3 easy tech game wiki](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/intel-greg-bryant.jpeg)
In other words, a Gannt Chart of the future. What if we make a graph of future technologies and applications, showing their relative positions in time as we anticipate them? What if we show the dependencies between those technologies? We want to make a directed graph of technologies, with the parents of a technology representing its prerequisites. The idea of making technology trees is not new. This page proposes a project: to jointly create a technology tree mapping likely future technological developments from a transhumanist perspective.